All posts tagged Lead Management

Finding the Right KPIs in the Sales Funnel

gr-reporting

Marketing automation has become a key factor in differentiating what marketing was capable of accomplishing once upon a time compared to what marketing is capable of today, and this is essentially the ability to track ROI more effectively and more efficiently than ever.

By zeroing-in on key areas in our marketing efforts, we are able to improve marketing performance, drive more prospects into the sales funnel, and produce higher quality leads. The challenge, however, is to determine which marketing activities we should be employing and which activities we should reduce or eliminate all together.

Continue reading →

Establishing a Lead Management Process

In a recent survey conducted by DemandGen Report, 50 early marketing automation adopters were asked “What would be the first thing you would suggest to another organization upon rolling out a marketing automation system?” Over 75% said before anything else, they would “build a proper process to feed the automation system first.”

It’s very hard and next to impossible for marketers to achieve goals without having a set process in place. The kind of process we are talking about is one that feeds the CRM with sales ready leads as a result of marketing campaigns and activities. You may be thinking to yourself “lead generation is of primary importance to me.” Although lead generation is crucial (seeing as more and more leads fall out of the funnel with each transitional stage in the sales cycle), lead management remains an integral component that entails passing on sales ready leads to the CRM for the win.

Continue reading →

Getting the Hottest Leads to Sales and No Sooner!

Marketers are gaining leverage in the continuous war with their friends at their local sales department.

It’s true, once upon a time, long before automated technology took a significant role in the field of marketing, the sales guys were to blame for failed efforts at potential client meetings. However, they always rebuked: “Marketing isn’t doing a good enough job at pre-qualifying the leads they send us!” So once marketing gained a significant advantage with marketing automation tools that would measure campaign performance and the quality of each lead, marketing once again got the upper hand.

Marketing and sales may continue to fight like cats and dogs forever, but that doesn’t change the fact they really have to get along despite their rivalry.

Continue reading →

Welcome Aboard!

In the past few weeks, several of our clients have requested some help with a nurturing campaign. Not an uncommon request for our consultants here, but in my case, after reviewing the end goals and expected results, it became apparent that it was not so much a traditional nurturing campaign, but more of an on-boarding or AWP (automated welcoming program). Essentially, these clients wanted a way to welcome and introduce net-new contacts to their brand, products, services and resources using emails and hypersites.

One particular client had developed an idea wherein they wanted to leverage Eloqua’s Program Builder, Email and PURL-based Hypersites to direct all new contacts in the database to a personalized resource portal that featured their top 5 whitepaper/resources, their sales rep’s information (lead owner) and some personalized messaging based on their industry or vertical. Not to say that other organizations aren’t applying this type of program to their net new leads, but it dawned on me that the majority of nurturing efforts occur after lead scoring, and a few weeks of traditional communication efforts have not made them MQLs. This particular program engaged the lead within 24 hours of becoming an Eloqua contact and provided a tremendous amount of value right away to the prospective lead.

The determination of whether or not a lead qualified was fairly simple: Was the Date Created within the last 24 hours, or did the lead have a SFDC Lead Status of “Prospect, No Opportunity” and was Modified by CRM within the last 24 hours, and had that particular contact not run through the program previously? If all of those answers were true, then the feeder would fire and they would begin their path. An email was sent the following business day welcoming them to the company, and quickly let them know that there were some key, and more importantly free, resources available to them that they are encouraged to view on a personalized Hypersite page. When any of the assets were viewed/downloaded, a closed SFDC activity was written to their record, notifying the lead owner that the lead’s interest was mounting and that they were now far more educated about the client’s products and services than they were a mere 24 hours ago. On the Hypersite page itself, the lead owner’s information was clearly present, which gave an additional personalized touch to the resource page, and essentially put a name (and a face) to the connection between them and the next step in the relationship.

Now, we know that the first email isn’t always going to peak the interest of a particular contact, and as Steve Woods posted in his blog last week, evaluating which contacts clicked through and visited the hypersite and those that did not is the key to nurturing these welcoming messages. Putting a decision rule after the email send will allow you to ‘bucket’ those that did not action the first email, and allows you to change your messaging to this group and try them again at a later date. Steve referenced 4 days, but again, that is up to the client. With this particular example, the second email went out 3 weeks later, and a 3rd email went out 4 weeks later after evaluating visitors vs. non-visitors.

This is a very valuable tool/method for treating new contacts/leads in a way that will educate, empower and engage them quickly and effectively while passing on value immediately. If you have access to Program Builder and Hypersites this is a must have, and truly will help you gain that all-important first touch that you leads and contacts are probably really going to want.